NOW YOU GIIIIIIIIIVE LOOOOOOOVE A B-A-D NAAAAAME!!!!!
!

SSX Tricky's GariBALDy map popped in my head some seconds after the bald joke. Oh dear...

It's great Clock-O-Weed entertainment.

The concept is interesting.

... ADDICTIVE!!!! :) :) :) :) :) By the way, all the soundtracks of this game are satisfying my Netzscheen needs!

The only flaw is surely the end of the vicious cycle that lacks possibilities (there's always only one end). I couldn't want to try it too often as it hurted my tender heart, but it's exactly why it's so awesome: it comes with a earth-grounded critic of social media's influence on people. I could brag about TV media first, since there was at some moment a worldwide decision of TV medias to show more negative things than positive ones to get people sticked to their TV screens. But here, it depicts the universal torment of human being's carelessness towards their perception of others. The most horrifying truth here is to think that no matter how we may try to be right, we are separated by the most simple things, as well as the most complicated things. Your work is important to the Post-Modernity Era.

It's sad I didn't cry, but the asonance at approximately 2min.10sec. shook me. I think it would be the best emotional carrier if it was dominating the song, letting the distorted synths in the background for giving a touch of harmony (because only a few could keep listening to detuned notes forever! ;) ). In overall, it need more variety, but I'm sur you can experiment some great gems.

Sounded like an audition with a slight lack of practice. I am really fond of real instrumentists, so I still aknowledge your strong bravery. You should practice your metronomical sense to prevent any instrument delay in between and keep the breath of your song unhalted. The solo of electric guitar is the masterpart of this song, as I can feel the symbiosis between you and your instrument. And don't forget to put more transitions so the breath of the song don't choke off.

Lacks colors. Lacks variety. The very end of the song is where something is really happening, but then again, I can sense some kind of fear of experimentation. Don't be afraid to take risks.

Edit 01: Before the in-depth stuff, I have to make you notice you also use samples.
Now. to help myself (and you too) going deeper in your soundtrack, I decided to decorticate it:

I- Intro (00:00:00 to 00:02:30) A perfect intro.
II- Verse A) 1 (00:32:30 to 00:56:30) You made a musical segment and duplicated it so it can last enough for a verse. The only variation is at the last 4 notes of both segments, so there's something that can be improved (you could take risks). Except that, it works fine.

III- Chorus 1 (00:56:30 to 01:08:30) The most awful, yet most important part of the song. It is less "lively" than the verse, so you should invert the "life" you put into chorus and verse to never loose the "breath" of the song. Just imagine that the song breath must blow calmly yet not too much for the verses, intensely at the chorus, calmly at the bridges and badass at the solos.

IV- Verse A) 2 I (01:08:30 to 01:20:30) It's the exact first half of Chorus 1.
V- Verse A) 2 II (01:20:30 to 01:32:30) It's the exact second half of Chorus 1, but you added some synth pad melody (it's called a melody filler) to make the repetition less boring. Even though, you still didn't save it from the monotony of the repetition (you could take risks).
VI- Bridge (01:32:30 to 01:56:30) A perfect Bridge to create a variation in the song.
V!!- Solo 1 (01:56:30 to 02:29:30) I give a 9/10 for this section. You truly show your tremolo, bending and dropping skills. The only thing I found less interesting was the long notes without effect that were put to fill the lack of creativity between your awesome parts. It's really a tiny default that you can legitimately underlook and keep going.

VIII- Solo 2 (02:29:30 to 02:41:30) That's a solo filler you should be worried about. Arpeggios-like solos can be really effective if you take more risks and keep it less repetitive, so I'm sure it could be so much worth improving. The whole solo part would gain a lot of power (you could take risks). I do create some of my arpeggios note-to-note to be sure I make its dynanism going crazier. Of course, it's not every composer that can seize it and I'm modest enough to admit I can get issues about it.

IX- Solo 3 (02:41:30 to 02:47:30) Your talent is back at this section! :) I smiled to it. You even composed something more intense for the other samples, so you blew it.
X- Chorus 2 A) (02:47:30 to 02:59:30) The counter-time rythm of the battery composition is great, but could be even more chaotic to really throw the song end in a powerful blast (you could take risks). The chorus main melody needs more legato in it's downs, so you could make it more intense, yet not too sostiphicated.
X!- Chorus 2 B) (02:59:30 to 03:10) The solo filler is too weak for that moment of the song. It must to blow everybody away (you could take risks).
XII- Conclusion 1 (03:10:30 to 03:16:30) The second best part. It's the necesary conclusion that concludes perfectly the song.
XIII- Conlusion 2 (03:16:30 to 03:17:00) You tried to make it a conclusion, like many American composers of the 20th Century. You could just remove it, since it's a short repetition of the same note for each used sample. It's exactly where you could make it a 4-notes crescendo.

CONCLUSION: You perfectly mastered the introduction, the bridge and Conclusion 1 and you almost perfectly mastered the solo. But... You messed up more or less all the other parts (the necessary ones, such as the verses and the chorus). I'm looking forward in your next creations / remakes and wish you to take me seriously (by the way, thanks for your critic on my submission for the competition).

What captivates me is the "What will happen next?" question popping automatically in my brain...

She needs herself. This is exactly what she expressess. By the way, JoSilver, Jesus Christ is a very-very old thing from the wombs of Rome Antique. She is in a time where survival chances is not the same as in Rome Antique: if there were zombies, nobody would survive. Jesus would become a zombie and we would not exist right now. Clementine facial expression is at best here: menacing attitude, but calm and sure of her actions. This is the third time I comment about a work on a female character and I wonder if they were drawn for Women's day? XDXDXD Keep that professionality, artist.

I like the art, but it's not the creepyness that I felt: it's the edgyness of character's look and move. The look is more cool and confident than mysteriously creepy (I'm sure that the intention is more in my perspective than by most of people's.)The genius part is the positioning of her feet and hand. The feet are close and they take a narrow space, expressing the womanly strong personality of the character. The right hand (from her perspective) Is following the same character's female personality strenght while the left hand (from her perspective) is the edgy signal; all is confirmed from that hand! The most simple details can really put a drawing out of ordinary. By the way, for the commentators who argue about creepyness, look at how the artist drew her own name in the left corner: it's a bit creepy, but more stylistical, even a bit like a graffiti. This artist does have a second side worth exploring.